Tweet
เอาผลทดสอบantivirus,spyware,Firewall ที่รว
เริ่มต้นกันด้วยเว็บ http://www.av-comparatives.org/ ชื่อดัง 
ที่ให้ Award แอนตี้ไวรัสต่างๆ
เป็นผลทดสอบประเภท On-demand comparative February 2007
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...se_2007_02.php
และ Report
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...e/report13.pdf
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...dgrouptest.pdf
และจาก http://www.eweek.com เมื่อ October 2, 2006
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C18...23127%2C00.asp
ให้ข่าวว่าทาง AV-Test
ได้ทำการทดสอบแอนตี้ไวรัส โดยใช้มัลแวร์ทั้งหมด 289,682 มี Backdoors 59,053 ตัว Bots 70,658 ตัว และ trojan horses 159,971 ตัว
ได้ผลตามรูปข้างล่าง
และข่าวจาก http://www.pcwelt.de เมื่อ 27.11.2006
http://www.pcwelt.de/news/sicherheit/64946/index.html
ให้ข่าวว่าทาง AV-Test ได้ทำการทดสอบแอนตี้ไวรัส โดยใช้มัลแวร์ทั้งหมด 466.000 โดยมี worms 83.000 ตัว Bots 86.000 ตัว trojan horses 218.000 ตัว และ Backdoors 79.000 ตัว
ได้ผลตามรูปข้างล่าง
และเว็บนี้ครับ http://www.pc-professionell.de/
http://www.pc-professionell.de/praxi...612180252.aspx
และจากเว็บ http://winnow.oitc.com
และจากเว็บนี้ 2006/05/17
http://nepenthes.mwcollect.org/stats:scannertest
และจาก Malware Test Lab http://www.malware-test.com/ ทดสอบล่าสุดเมื่อ (Feb 26, 2007)
http://malware-test-lab.googlegroups...V3Zvs76YMEWYL0
และทดสอบ Antispyware จากเว็บเดียวกัน (January 3, 2007)
http://malware-test-lab.googlegroups...dgdzjn6DpnGFGY
และล่าสุดทดสอบจาก www.virus.gr
http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/...p?id=85&mnu=85
23 April-10 May 2007 (NEW!!!)
Rank
1. Kaspersky version 7.0.0.43 beta - 99.23%
2. Kaspersky version 6.0.2.614 - 99.13%
3. Active Virus Shield by AOL version 6.0.0.308 - 99.13%
4. ZoneAlarm with KAV Antivirus version 7.0.337.000 - 99.13%
5. F-Secure 2007 version 7.01.128 - 98.56%
6. BitDefender Professional version 10 - 97.70%
7. BullGuard version 7.0.0.23 - 96.59%
8. Ashampoo version 1.30 - 95.80%
9. eScan version 8.0.671.1 - 94.43%
10. Nod32 version 2.70.32 - 94.00%
11. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 93.27%
12. Avast Professional version 4.7.986 - 92.82%
13. AVG Anti-Malware version 7.5.465 - 92.14%
14. F-Prot version 6.0.6.4 - 91.35%
15. McAfee Enterprise version 8.5.0i+AntiSpyware module - 90.65%
16. Panda 2007 version 2.01.00 - 90.06%
17. Norman version 5.90.37 - 88.47%
18. ArcaVir 2007 - 88.24%
19. McAfee version 11.0.213 - 86.13%
20. Norton Professional 2007 - 86.08%
21. Rising AV version 19.19.42 - 85.46%
22. Dr. Web version 4.33.2 - 85.09%
23. PC-Cillin 2007 version 15.00.1450 - 84.96%
24. Iolo version 1.1.8 - 83.35%
25. Virus Chaser version 5.0a - 79.51%
26. VBA32 version 3.11.4 - 77.66%
27. Sophos Sweep version 6.5.1 - 69.79%
28. ViRobot Expert version 5.0 - 69.53%
29. Antiy Ghostbusters version 5.2.1 - 65.95%
30. Zondex Guard version 5.4.2 - 63.79%
31. Vexira 2006 version 5.002.62 - 60.07%
32. V3 Internet Security version 2007.04.21.00 - 55.09%
33. Comodo version 2.0.12.47 beta - 53.94%
34. Comodo version 1.1.0.3 - 53.39%
35. A-Squared Anti-Malware version 2.1 - 52.69%
36. Ikarus version 5.19 - 50.56%
37. Digital Patrol version 5.00.37 - 49.80%
38. ClamWin version 0.90.1 - 47.95%
39. Quick Heal version 9.00 - 38.64%
40. Solo version 5.1 build 5.7.3 - 34.52%
41. Protector Plus version 8.0.A02 - 33.13%
42. PcClear version 1.0.4.3 - 27.14%
43. AntiTrojan Shield version 2.1.0.14 - 20.25%
44. PC Door Guard version 4.2.0.35- 19.95%
45. Trojan Hunter version 4.6.930 - 19.20%
46. VirIT version 6.1.75 - 18.78%
47. E-Trust PestPatrol version 8.0.0.6 - 11.80%
48. Trojan Remover version 6.6.0 - 10.44%
49. The Cleaner version 4.2.4319 - 7.26%
50. True Sword version 4.2 - 2.20%
51. Hacker Eliminator version 1.2 - 1.43%
52. Abacre version 1.4 - 0.00%
และจาก CheckVir ที่ให้Awardแอนตี้ไวรัสเหมือนกัน
http://www.checkvir.com/
ทดสอบล่าสุดเมื่อ March 2007
http://www.checkvir.com/index.php?CN=30.3.60&CIE=0
http://www.checkvir.com/pdf/eredmenyek0703.pdf
ได้ผลตามรูป
และจาก VB100% Virus Bulletin
http://www.virusbtn.com/index
ทดสอบ VB100% 04/2007
Linux VB100 update
False positive rules clarified, Dr. Web results recalculated.
VB plans a review of the test procedures for the VB100 comparative testing and certification program, after some issues arising from the recent Linux comparative (see the April issue of VB) have brought to light a lack of clarity in the publicly-available procedures document (here).
The methodology of the tests insists that, to qualify for a VB100 award, a product must not raise any false positives while scanning our set of known-clean files. However, files flagged as 'suspicious' are allowed and do not count as false positives. In the recent Linux comparative, ESET's Nod32 product flagged one clean file as 'probably unknown TSR.COM.EXE virus', and was thus adjudged ineligible for the award. This decision was queried by ESET on the basis that such a detection may be considered a suspicious flag rather than a full false positive.
VB has stood by the decision to deny the award in this case, as it was felt that the terminology used to flag the detection was too strong to be considered merely 'suspicious', and also as the same flag has been and continues to be counted as a detection when scanning infected testsets. Files flagged as such were also included in the final 'infected files' count. It is clear that it would be improper to allow the same marker to count as a detection but not as a false positive.
'Nod32 has an outstanding record in the VB100', said John Hawes, Technical Consultant at Virus Bulletin, in charge of VB100 testing. 'The product has proven successful in more tests than any other, and has never missed an In-The-Wild virus since our tests began in 1998. It also consistently shines in our speed testing, and in my experience is one of the most flexible and useable products on the market. I'm sure this will be a minor blip in their VB100 record, and that ESET will continue to produce excellent results in future tests.'
The false positive flag is thought to have been caused by an erroneous increase in the heuristics level in the version of the product submitted for testing.
In a separate issue, closer analysis of the last set of results has revealed some errors in the detection figures shown for Doctor Web's Dr. Web product. These errors were due to differences in the presentation of infections in certain filetypes within the Dr. Web logs, resulting in automated analysis tools failing to record the detections. Further investigation and retesting has confirmed that the version of Dr. Web submitted for testing did in fact prove capable of detecting all samples in our 'Macro', 'File Infector', 'Linux' and 'Worms and Bots' testsets, scoring 100% in all of these categories.
A small number of samples in the 'Polymorphic' set were correctly recorded as misses, and as the failure to detect three samples from the core WildList set is also confirmed, the product remains ineligible for the VB100 award. Appropriate adjustments to our online results pages will be made as soon as possible, and VB extends apologies to Doctor Web for these errors.
18 April 2007
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/vb_news/2007/04_18.xml
Questionable false positive file removed
Amendment to VB's April Linux comparative review.
In Virus Bulletin's April 2007 Linux comparative review (see VB, April 2007, p.11), VB reported that ESET's product NOD32 had generated a false positive during scanning of the older part of the clean test set. after further investigation and careful consideration, VB now deems that the file alerted on was inappropriate for inclusion in the clean test set. The file will be removed from the clean test set with immediate effect. A VB100 is therefore awarded to NOD32. No other products were affected.
Virus Bulletin - VB2007 button
04 May 2007
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/vb_news/2007/05_04.xml
และจาก PC World Chart
Top Antivirus Performers
Kaspersky's first-rate but pricey program offers a smooth, easy-to-use design and excellent protection against malware.
Erik Larkin, PC World
Monday, April 23, 2007, 01:00 AM PDT
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130869/article.html
Antivirus Software
Side-by-Side Comparison
Monday, April 23, 2007, 01:00 AM PDT
http://www.pcworld.com/product/testr...&prodid=29902#
และนี้เป็นงาน CeBit 2007 ที่เยอรมัน ในด้าน Hardware และ Software ที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในโลก คล้ายๆ Commart Thailand 2007 ที่บ้านเรา
่
http://www.av-comparatives.org/forum...opic.php?t=707
จากเว็บ http://www.av-comparatives.org/
ผลทดสอบ Firewall จากเว็บทดสอบการป้องกัน Leak-test ต่างๆ
http://www.matousec.com/projects/win...ts-results.php
เป็นไงบ้างครับ แอนตี้ไวรัส แอนตี้สปายแวร์ ไฟวอล์ ของท่านอยู่อันด้ีบไหนกันบ้าง ผมขอบอกไว้ก่อนว่าแอนตี้ไวรัสทุกตัวไม่พบไวรัสทุกตัวในโลกหรอกครับ ไวรัสมันเกิดขึ้นเรื่อยๆ แต่เราจะเลือกแอนตี้ไวรัสที่เหมาะกับเราที่สุด ไม่หน่วงเครื่องเรา และที่สำคัญก็ดูผลทดสอบ Detection Rate ทีี่ได้ทดสอบมาจากที่ต่างๆ แล้วก็เลือกให้เหมาะสมกับเรานะครับ
ที่ให้ Award แอนตี้ไวรัสต่างๆเป็นผลทดสอบประเภท On-demand comparative February 2007
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...se_2007_02.php
และ Report
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...e/report13.pdf
http://www.av-comparatives.org/seite...dgrouptest.pdf
และจาก http://www.eweek.com เมื่อ October 2, 2006
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C18...23127%2C00.asp
ให้ข่าวว่าทาง AV-Test
ได้ทำการทดสอบแอนตี้ไวรัส โดยใช้มัลแวร์ทั้งหมด 289,682 มี Backdoors 59,053 ตัว Bots 70,658 ตัว และ trojan horses 159,971 ตัว
ได้ผลตามรูปข้างล่าง
และข่าวจาก http://www.pcwelt.de เมื่อ 27.11.2006
http://www.pcwelt.de/news/sicherheit/64946/index.html
ให้ข่าวว่าทาง AV-Test
ได้ทำการทดสอบแอนตี้ไวรัส โดยใช้มัลแวร์ทั้งหมด 466.000 โดยมี worms 83.000 ตัว Bots 86.000 ตัว trojan horses 218.000 ตัว และ Backdoors 79.000 ตัวได้ผลตามรูปข้างล่าง
และเว็บนี้ครับ http://www.pc-professionell.de/
http://www.pc-professionell.de/praxi...612180252.aspx
และจากเว็บ http://winnow.oitc.com
และจากเว็บนี้ 2006/05/17
http://nepenthes.mwcollect.org/stats:scannertest
และจาก Malware Test Lab http://www.malware-test.com/ ทดสอบล่าสุดเมื่อ (Feb 26, 2007)
http://malware-test-lab.googlegroups...V3Zvs76YMEWYL0
และทดสอบ Antispyware จากเว็บเดียวกัน (January 3, 2007)
http://malware-test-lab.googlegroups...dgdzjn6DpnGFGY
และล่าสุดทดสอบจาก www.virus.gr
http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/...p?id=85&mnu=85
23 April-10 May 2007 (NEW!!!)
Rank
1. Kaspersky version 7.0.0.43 beta - 99.23%
2. Kaspersky version 6.0.2.614 - 99.13%
3. Active Virus Shield by AOL version 6.0.0.308 - 99.13%
4. ZoneAlarm with KAV Antivirus version 7.0.337.000 - 99.13%
5. F-Secure 2007 version 7.01.128 - 98.56%
6. BitDefender Professional version 10 - 97.70%
7. BullGuard version 7.0.0.23 - 96.59%
8. Ashampoo version 1.30 - 95.80%
9. eScan version 8.0.671.1 - 94.43%
10. Nod32 version 2.70.32 - 94.00%
11. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 93.27%
12. Avast Professional version 4.7.986 - 92.82%
13. AVG Anti-Malware version 7.5.465 - 92.14%
14. F-Prot version 6.0.6.4 - 91.35%
15. McAfee Enterprise version 8.5.0i+AntiSpyware module - 90.65%
16. Panda 2007 version 2.01.00 - 90.06%
17. Norman version 5.90.37 - 88.47%
18. ArcaVir 2007 - 88.24%
19. McAfee version 11.0.213 - 86.13%
20. Norton Professional 2007 - 86.08%
21. Rising AV version 19.19.42 - 85.46%
22. Dr. Web version 4.33.2 - 85.09%
23. PC-Cillin 2007 version 15.00.1450 - 84.96%
24. Iolo version 1.1.8 - 83.35%
25. Virus Chaser version 5.0a - 79.51%
26. VBA32 version 3.11.4 - 77.66%
27. Sophos Sweep version 6.5.1 - 69.79%
28. ViRobot Expert version 5.0 - 69.53%
29. Antiy Ghostbusters version 5.2.1 - 65.95%
30. Zondex Guard version 5.4.2 - 63.79%
31. Vexira 2006 version 5.002.62 - 60.07%
32. V3 Internet Security version 2007.04.21.00 - 55.09%
33. Comodo version 2.0.12.47 beta - 53.94%
34. Comodo version 1.1.0.3 - 53.39%
35. A-Squared Anti-Malware version 2.1 - 52.69%
36. Ikarus version 5.19 - 50.56%
37. Digital Patrol version 5.00.37 - 49.80%
38. ClamWin version 0.90.1 - 47.95%
39. Quick Heal version 9.00 - 38.64%
40. Solo version 5.1 build 5.7.3 - 34.52%
41. Protector Plus version 8.0.A02 - 33.13%
42. PcClear version 1.0.4.3 - 27.14%
43. AntiTrojan Shield version 2.1.0.14 - 20.25%
44. PC Door Guard version 4.2.0.35- 19.95%
45. Trojan Hunter version 4.6.930 - 19.20%
46. VirIT version 6.1.75 - 18.78%
47. E-Trust PestPatrol version 8.0.0.6 - 11.80%
48. Trojan Remover version 6.6.0 - 10.44%
49. The Cleaner version 4.2.4319 - 7.26%
50. True Sword version 4.2 - 2.20%
51. Hacker Eliminator version 1.2 - 1.43%
52. Abacre version 1.4 - 0.00%
และจาก CheckVir ที่ให้Awardแอนตี้ไวรัสเหมือนกัน
http://www.checkvir.com/
ทดสอบล่าสุดเมื่อ March 2007
http://www.checkvir.com/index.php?CN=30.3.60&CIE=0
http://www.checkvir.com/pdf/eredmenyek0703.pdf
ได้ผลตามรูป
และจาก VB100% Virus Bulletin
http://www.virusbtn.com/index
ทดสอบ VB100% 04/2007
Linux VB100 update
False positive rules clarified, Dr. Web results recalculated.
VB plans a review of the test procedures for the VB100 comparative testing and certification program, after some issues arising from the recent Linux comparative (see the April issue of VB) have brought to light a lack of clarity in the publicly-available procedures document (here).
The methodology of the tests insists that, to qualify for a VB100 award, a product must not raise any false positives while scanning our set of known-clean files. However, files flagged as 'suspicious' are allowed and do not count as false positives. In the recent Linux comparative, ESET's Nod32 product flagged one clean file as 'probably unknown TSR.COM.EXE virus', and was thus adjudged ineligible for the award. This decision was queried by ESET on the basis that such a detection may be considered a suspicious flag rather than a full false positive.
VB has stood by the decision to deny the award in this case, as it was felt that the terminology used to flag the detection was too strong to be considered merely 'suspicious', and also as the same flag has been and continues to be counted as a detection when scanning infected testsets. Files flagged as such were also included in the final 'infected files' count. It is clear that it would be improper to allow the same marker to count as a detection but not as a false positive.
'Nod32 has an outstanding record in the VB100', said John Hawes, Technical Consultant at Virus Bulletin, in charge of VB100 testing. 'The product has proven successful in more tests than any other, and has never missed an In-The-Wild virus since our tests began in 1998. It also consistently shines in our speed testing, and in my experience is one of the most flexible and useable products on the market. I'm sure this will be a minor blip in their VB100 record, and that ESET will continue to produce excellent results in future tests.'
The false positive flag is thought to have been caused by an erroneous increase in the heuristics level in the version of the product submitted for testing.
In a separate issue, closer analysis of the last set of results has revealed some errors in the detection figures shown for Doctor Web's Dr. Web product. These errors were due to differences in the presentation of infections in certain filetypes within the Dr. Web logs, resulting in automated analysis tools failing to record the detections. Further investigation and retesting has confirmed that the version of Dr. Web submitted for testing did in fact prove capable of detecting all samples in our 'Macro', 'File Infector', 'Linux' and 'Worms and Bots' testsets, scoring 100% in all of these categories.
A small number of samples in the 'Polymorphic' set were correctly recorded as misses, and as the failure to detect three samples from the core WildList set is also confirmed, the product remains ineligible for the VB100 award. Appropriate adjustments to our online results pages will be made as soon as possible, and VB extends apologies to Doctor Web for these errors.
18 April 2007
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/vb_news/2007/04_18.xml
Questionable false positive file removed
Amendment to VB's April Linux comparative review.
In Virus Bulletin's April 2007 Linux comparative review (see VB, April 2007, p.11), VB reported that ESET's product NOD32 had generated a false positive during scanning of the older part of the clean test set. after further investigation and careful consideration, VB now deems that the file alerted on was inappropriate for inclusion in the clean test set. The file will be removed from the clean test set with immediate effect. A VB100 is therefore awarded to NOD32. No other products were affected.
Virus Bulletin - VB2007 button
04 May 2007
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/vb_news/2007/05_04.xml
และจาก PC World Chart
Top Antivirus Performers
Kaspersky's first-rate but pricey program offers a smooth, easy-to-use design and excellent protection against malware.
Erik Larkin, PC World
Monday, April 23, 2007, 01:00 AM PDT
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,130869/article.html
Antivirus Software
Side-by-Side Comparison
Monday, April 23, 2007, 01:00 AM PDT
http://www.pcworld.com/product/testr...&prodid=29902#
และนี้เป็นงาน CeBit 2007 ที่เยอรมัน ในด้าน Hardware และ Software ที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในโลก คล้ายๆ Commart Thailand 2007 ที่บ้านเรา
่
http://www.av-comparatives.org/forum...opic.php?t=707
จากเว็บ http://www.av-comparatives.org/
ผลทดสอบ Firewall จากเว็บทดสอบการป้องกัน Leak-test ต่างๆ
http://www.matousec.com/projects/win...ts-results.php
เป็นไงบ้างครับ แอนตี้ไวรัส แอนตี้สปายแวร์ ไฟวอล์ ของท่านอยู่อันด้ีบไหนกันบ้าง ผมขอบอกไว้ก่อนว่าแอนตี้ไวรัสทุกตัวไม่พบไวรัสทุกตัวในโลกหรอกครับ ไวรัสมันเกิดขึ้นเรื่อยๆ แต่เราจะเลือกแอนตี้ไวรัสที่เหมาะกับเราที่สุด ไม่หน่วงเครื่องเรา และที่สำคัญก็ดูผลทดสอบ Detection Rate ทีี่ได้ทดสอบมาจากที่ต่างๆ แล้วก็เลือกให้เหมาะสมกับเรานะครับ
Comment